CHIPOLONE v. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLIFTON | N.J. | Judgment | Law | CaseMine

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem

AMICUS AI

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Aaron Heller argued the cause for the prosecutor-appellant ( Heller Kaiks, attorneys). Mr. John G. Dluhy argued the cause for the defendant-respondent.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Aaron Heller argued the cause for the prosecutor-appellant ( Heller Kaiks, attorneys). Mr. John G. Dluhy argued the cause for the defendant-respondent.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

FRANK CHIPOLONE, SR., PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE CITYOF CLIFTON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Case in the court below.

For affirmance: Chief Justice VANDERBILT and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, and ACKERSON — 5.

For reversal: None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments