MIKESKA v. UNITED STATES

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 9708.

Attorney(S)

Mr. Warren E. Miller, of Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. David S. Allshouse, of Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. John W. Pehle, of Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Lawrence S. Lesser of Washington D.C., was on the brief, for appellee Joe M. Mikeska. Messrs. D. Vance Swann, Atty., Dept. of Justice, George Morris Fay, U.S. Atty. and Sidney S. Sachs and Thomas E. Walsh, Asst. U.S. Attys., all of Washington, D.C., entered appearances for appellee, United States of America.

Judges

Henry White Edgerton
Bennett Champ Clark
Wilbur Kingsbury Miller

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 9708.

Attorney(S)

Mr. Warren E. Miller, of Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. David S. Allshouse, of Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. John W. Pehle, of Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Lawrence S. Lesser of Washington D.C., was on the brief, for appellee Joe M. Mikeska. Messrs. D. Vance Swann, Atty., Dept. of Justice, George Morris Fay, U.S. Atty. and Sidney S. Sachs and Thomas E. Walsh, Asst. U.S. Attys., all of Washington, D.C., entered appearances for appellee, United States of America.

Judges

Henry White Edgerton
Bennett Champ Clark
Wilbur Kingsbury Miller

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

MIKESKA v. UNITED STATES et al.

PER CURIAM.

The case must be affirmed. The only questions involved are the intention of the insured soldier and whether or not he took such steps to effectuate his intention to change the beneficiary of his policy (if he had any such intention) as reasonably might be expected under the circumstances. We find nothing in the record to cause us to disturb the decision of judge Letts based upon his findings of fact and conclusions of law, which we therefore adopt.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

MIKESKA v. UNITED STATES et al.

Comments