NAUMAN v. CENTRAL LAFAYETTE REALTY COMPANY, INC, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Harry Green argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant ( Messrs. Mintz Herships, attorneys). Mr. George F. Lahey, Jr., argued the cause for the defendant-respondent.

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Harry Green argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant ( Messrs. Mintz Herships, attorneys). Mr. George F. Lahey, Jr., argued the cause for the defendant-respondent.

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

WILBUR NAUMAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CENTRAL LAFAYETTE REALTY COMPANY,INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Burling in the court below.

For affirmance: Chief Justice VANDERBILT and Justices OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD and ACKERSON — 4.

For reversal: Justice HEHER — 1.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.