Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Fay Riddlesbarger, Appellee, v. Rufus Riddlesbarger, Appellant, and Lanteen Laboratories, Inc. et al., Defendants.

DIVORCE, §§ 169, 173 — alimony. Where there was uncontradicted evidence that wife had made substantial cash contributions to create husband's incorporated business, and husband had continuously lived in another state after service of summons in wife's suit for divorce and was siphoning his assets out of Illinois, an allowance of alimony in gross was proper, and gross award of $100,000 was not excessive under evidence that wife was 51 years old and was a housewife without business experience and that husband's stock holdings had a book value in excess of $600,000.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Opinion by JUSTICE FRIEND.

Not to be published in full. Opinion filed December 30, 1948; released for publication January 18, 1949.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RIDDLESBARGER v. RIDDLESBARGER
(Dec 30, 1948)