Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

C.T. POTTER et al., Appellants, v. KAISER COMPANY, Inc., a Corporation, and United States of America, Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed upon the authority of Rogers Cartage Co. v. Reynolds, 6 Cir., 166 F.2d 317; Seese v. Bethlehem Steel Co., 4 Cir., 168 F.2d 58; Atallah v. B.H. Hubbert Son, 4 Cir., 168 F.2d 993, certiorari denied Cingrigani v. B.H. Hubbert Son, 69 S. Ct. 138; Battaglia v. General Motors Corp., 2 Cir., 169 F.2d 254, certiorari denied 69 S.Ct. 236; Darr v. Mutual Life Ins. Co., 2 Cir., 169 F.2d 262, certiorari denied 69 S.Ct. 166; Fisch v. General Motors Corp., 6 Cir., 169 F.2d 266, certiorari denied 69 S.Ct. 405.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

POTTER v. KAISER COMPANY
(Jan 10, 1949)