Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

City of Chicago, Appellee, v. Mel

SAVING QUESTIONS for REVIEW, § 8 — validity of ordinances. Validity of ordinances prescribing type of materials to be used in buildings constructed in fire limits could not be challenged by defendant on appeal from judgment finding defendant guilty of violating ordinances, where defendant filed no pleadings or motion to strike complaint on ground that ordinances were invalid and did not object to their validity when they were offered in evidence.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Opinion by JUSTICE FRIEND.

Not to be published in fun. Opinion filed May 10, 1949; released for publication June 3, 1949.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CITY OF CHICAGO, v. BERNSTEIN
(May 10, 1949)