Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

GEORGE CASTILLO, Respondent, v. HARRY SPILNYK et al., Appellants.

Per Curiam.

The court was without jurisdiction to assess penalties under the Housing and Rent Act of 1947 (U.S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 1881 et seq.) for a period greater than twelve months prior to the commencement of the action, even though the Statute of Limitations was not pleaded ( Lindner v. Miracle Realty Corp., N YL.J., Oct. 18, 1947, p. 924, col. 7 [App. Term, 2d Dept.]; Thompson v. Taylor, 62 F. Supp. 930; Bowles v. Babcock, 65 F. Supp. 380).

It was error, too, for the court to have considered the area rent attorney's interpretation in resolving the facts of this case.

The judgment should be unanimously reversed, on the law, and a new trial granted, with $30 costs to the defendants to abide the event.

STEINBRINK, FENNELLY and COLDEN, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CASTILLO v. SPILNYK
(Jun 2, 1949)