ATKINSON, Presiding Justice.
This is an assignment of error to an order granting temporary alimony, and the sole question presented is as to the sufficiency of evidence to authorize the order; and there being no bona fide effort to brief the evidence, which is a stenographic report of questions and answers, interspersed with objections to testimony, colloquies between court and counsel, rulings of the court, and not in accordance with the requirements of Code § 70-305; accordingly, such a brief of evidence does not properly present the question sought to be reviewed and the decision of the trial judge must be affirmed. Harris v. McArthur, 90 Ga. 216 (3) ( 15 S.E. 758); McComb v. Hines, 123 Ga. 246 ( 51 S.E. 300); Carlisle v. Ray, 133 Ga. 223 ( 65 S.E. 408); Moore v. Walton 155 Ga. 481 ( 117 S.E. 743); Brown v. State, 163 Ga. 684 (1) ( 137 S.E. 31); Stapleton v. Union Central Life Insurance Co., 183 Ga. 117 (1) ( 187 S.E. 631); Progressive Life Insurance Co. v. Wallace, 61 Ga. App. 245 ( 6 S.E.2d 398); Boston Insurance Co. v. Harmon, 66 Ga. App. 383 ( 18 S.E.2d 84); James v. State, 73 Ga. App. 567 (1,2) ( 37 S.E.2d 548).
The provision of Code § 70-305 as to briefing the evidence is not confined to cases in which a motion for new trial is made, but applies also to all writs of error where questions raised require a review of the evidence. Cooper v. Whaley, 90 Ga. 285 (1) ( 15 S.E. 824); Batchelor v. Batchelor, 97 Ga. 425 ( 24 S.E. 157); Price v. High Co., 108 Ga. 145 ( 33 S.E. 956); Moreland v. Walker, 141 Ga. 541 ( 81 S.E. 854); Weathers v. Paga Mining Co., 147 Ga. 463 ( 94 S.E. 579); Cooper v. Harris, 39 Ga. App. 607 ( 147 S.E. 805).
Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.
No. 16666. JUNE 13, 1949. REHEARING DENIED JULY 14, 1949.