Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In re GEORGE FRANCIS LeVAN, JR., a Minor. MARY LeVAN, Appellant.

McCOMB, Acting P.J.

Appellant, who is the mother of George Francis LeVan, Jr., a minor, appeals on the judgment roll alone from an order of the Juvenile Court of Los Angeles County made January 3, 1949, releasing the custody of the minor to the probation officer for placement in the home of the minor's father.

It is to be noted that the mother had the right to appeal as an interested party. (Welf. Inst. Code (1944), § 580; In re Matter of Hill, 78 Cal.App. 23, 26 [ 247 P. 591].)

[1] Appellant asks that this court reverse the judgment of the juvenile court. However, since the appeal is upon the judgment roll alone, we must assume that the proceedings taken in the lower court were regular in all respects ( In re Pierce, 127 Cal.App. 773, 775 [ 16 P.2d 765]), and we are confined to an examination of the clerk's transcript on appeal to determine whether there is any reversible error.

An examination of such record fails to disclose any error, but on the contrary, shows that each document and order was duly and regularly made and entered. Appellant has failed either by argument or citation of authority to direct the attention of this court to any error in the proceedings leading to or in the order of placement from which the appeal is taken.

The order is affirmed.

Wilson, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing was denied July 28, 1949, and appellant's petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied August 11, 1949.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE LeVAN
(Jul 18, 1949)