Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ANDREWS v. DILANO et al.

HEAD, Justice.

The sole question before this court is whether or not the verdict is supported by any evidence. The evidence is not without conflict in several material particulars, but the verdict is supported by some evidence; and the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, his discretion in denying a new trial will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

No. 16843. OCTOBER 12, 1949.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ANDREWS v. DILANO
(Oct 12, 1949)