Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • LaRue Royce, of Salina, argued the cause, and B.I. Litowich, E.S. Hampton, H.H. Dunham, Jr.; John Q. Royce, and H.G. Engleman, all of Salina, were with him on the briefs for the appellant. Jerry E. Driscoll, of Russell, argued the cause, and John J. McCurdy, of Lincoln, was with him on the briefs for the appellee. George Siefkin and John F. Eberhardt, both of Wichita, filed brief amici curiae.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • LaRue Royce, of Salina, argued the cause, and B.I. Litowich, E.S. Hampton, H.H. Dunham, Jr.; John Q. Royce, and H.G. Engleman, all of Salina, were with him on the briefs for the appellant. Jerry E. Driscoll, of Russell, argued the cause, and John J. McCurdy, of Lincoln, was with him on the briefs for the appellee. George Siefkin and John F. Eberhardt, both of Wichita, filed brief amici curiae.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

CLARENCE OWEN, Appellee, v. MUTUAL BENEFIT HEALTH AND ACCIDENT ASSOCIATION, Appellant.

OPINION ON REHEARING

The opinion of the court was delivered by

HARVEY, C.J.:

Following our former opinion, counsel for appellant filed a motion for rehearing, which was granted, and the case was set for our July session. It was reargued by counsel, who filed additional briefs, and a brief was filed amici curiae. The court has reconsidered the questions originally argued and those argued on the rehearing, and has also considered the briefs, and finds no reason to disturb its former decision.

The court adheres to the order of affirmance.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

OWEN v. MUTUAL BENEFIT HEALTH ACC. ASS'N
(Oct 8, 1949)