Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Harry Norman BALL v. PARAMOUNT PICTURES, Inc. No. 9883 Loew's Incorporated, Appellant No. 9886 Paramount Pictures, Inc.; R.K.O. Radio Pictures, Inc.; Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.; Paramount Distributing Corp., Appellants. No. 9887 Pennware Theatre Corp. and A.N. Notopoulos, Appellants.

PER CURIAM.

This case was previously before this Court in No. 9233 and was decided in an opinion reported in 1948, 169 F.2d 317, as appears from the opinion. The form of the decree was left to the Court below.

The Court below entered its decree December 13, 1948, following which plaintiff appealed, No. 9874, 176 F.2d 426. Plaintiff's appeal challenged only the adequacy of the form of the decree.

Defendants then took these cross-appeals from the injunction decree, and in their brief and at the oral argument stated that the purpose of the cross-appeals was to preserve defendants' right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for a writ of certiorari from the decision in No. 9233, when a final judgment shall have been entered.

The decree of the District Court will be vacated and modified in the same respects as in No. 9874. There will be no costs to any of the parties against each other.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BALL v. PARAMOUNT PICTURES
(Sep 2, 1949)