Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

AMERICAN BANTAM CAR COMPANY, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The controlling question in this case is whether the exchange under which the assets of the taxpayer corporation were acquired upon its organization in exchange for its stock was one in which neither gain nor loss was to be recognized under Section 112(b) (5) of the Revenue Act of 1936, 26 U.S.C.A. § 112(b)(5). We are satisfied for the reasons well stated in the opinion filed by Judge Hill for the Tax Court in banc, 11 T.C. 397, that the transaction in question was such an exchange and that the assets accordingly took in the hands of the corporation the basis which they had in the hands of the transferors pursuant to Section 113(a)(8)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 113(a) (8)(A).

The decision of the Tax Court will be affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

AMERICAN BANTAM CAR v. C.I.R
(Nov 14, 1949)