Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

FINAN v. UNITED STATES.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion made under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate a judgment and sentence of imprisonment in a criminal case. The motion did no more than challenge the sufficiency of the proofs at the trial in which the prisoner was convicted; and it is too well settled to admit of argument that questions of this sort may not be raised by motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. Howell v. United States, 4 Cir., 172 F.2d 213, Taylor v. United States, 4 Cir., 177 F.2d 194.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FINAN v. UNITED STATES
(Nov 8, 1949)