Per Curiam.
It plainly appears that at the time of the "robbery" plaintiffs' messenger or agent was not actually cognizant of the commission of the alleged felonious act as testified; indeed he was not aware of such act. The loss was not by reason of the "robbery" as defined in the policy.
The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.
PECORA, EDER and HECHT, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed, etc.