PER CURIAM.
We have examined the record and the briefs in this cause and have heard the able argument of counsel at the bar of this court. It is well settled that the Chancellor's findings should not be disturbed on appeal unless shown to be clearly erroneous. Willis v. Van Woy et al., 155 Fla. 465, 20 So.2d 690; Farrington v. Harrison, 95 Fla. 769, 116 So. 497; Daino v. Daino, 155 Fla. 886, 22 So.2d 253.
It has not been made clearly to appear that the findings of the Chancellor are erroneous or that he abused his discretion or that there is not testimony in the record to sustain his conclusions.
The decree appealed from is, accordingly, affirmed.
ADAMS, C.J., and TERRELL, CHAPMAN and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.