PER CURIAM.
This appeal is from a consent judgment — a judgment which was consented to by appellant and appellee, and which the District Court had jurisdiction to render. Such a judgment is not reversible. Pacific R.R. v. Ketchum, 101 U.S. 289, 295, 25 L.Ed. 932; United States v. Babbitt, 104 U.S. 767, 768, 26 L.Ed. 921; Ballot v. United States, 1 Cir., 171 F. 404, 405; Curry v. Curry, 65 App.D.C. 47, 79 F.2d 172, 174; In re 4145 Broadway Hotel Co., 7 Cir., 100 F.2d 7, 8. See, also, Nashville, C. St. L. Ry. Co. v. United States, 113 U.S. 261, 266, 5 S.Ct. 460, 28 L.Ed. 971; Swift Co. v. United States, 276 U.S. 311, 327, 48 S.Ct. 311, 72 L.Ed. 587. The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.