Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

ALBERT REIZEN, Doing Business as INTER COUNTY PAINTING COMPANY, Respondent, v. MAX PARDES, Doing Business as CROWN PAINT WALLPAPER COMPANY, Defendant. MAX PARDES, Doing Business as CROWN PAINT WALLPAPER COMPANY, Third-Party Plaintiff,

Per Curiam.

The second third-party defendant having raised issues by its denial of the allegations of the main complaint, is, within the purview of section 288 of the Civil Practice Act to be deemed a "party" subject to examination before trial by plaintiff.

The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs.

STEINBRINK, RUBENSTEIN and COLDEN, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

REIZEN v. PARDES
(Mar 23, 1950)