AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

FREDERICK MAY CO., INC., Appellant, v. MORRIS MAILMAN, Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The testimony offered by plaintiff as to the financial ability on the part of the prospective purchasers was improperly excluded. Plaintiff upon a new trial should be afforded a full opportunity of establishing that there was a meeting of minds between the prospective buyers and seller on all the essential terms of the contract and that the purchasers were able to consummate the transaction.

The judgment should, accordingly, be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Peck, P.J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Judgment unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FREDERICK MAY CO., INC. v. MAILMAN
(Apr 25, 1950)