Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

FRANK A. MUIRHEAD v. CARL LUDWIG JOHNSON AND ANOTHER. CITY OF HASTINGS, INTERVENER. Reported in 42 N.W.2d 318.

Appeal and error — dismissal of appeal — proceedings on motion of parties for dismissal.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff and intervener moved to dismiss their respective appeals taken from a nonappealable order, without prejudice to their right to enter judgment in the action below and to appeal therefrom and to have such subsequent appeal considered upon the record and briefs already on file herein.

In direct violation of Supreme Court Rule IV (222 Minn. xxx), plaintiff and intervener have given defendants less than eight days' notice of hearing upon the above motions. Such motions therefore must be, and hereby are, dismissed.

However, in order to avoid a multiplicity of applications to this court, it appearing that no prejudice will result to defendants, this court of its own motion hereby dismisses the respective appeals of plaintiff and intervener herein for lack of jurisdiction. It is further ordered, in the event that judgment is subsequently entered below in the action and any appeal is taken therefrom, that such subsequent appeal may be heard and considered on the record and briefs already on file with this court.

Appeals dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MUIRHEAD v. CARL LUDWIG JOHNSON
(Apr 21, 1950)