Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Offering to sell services and soliciting money for services — In connection with issuing liquor permits — Contrary to Section 6064-20, General Code — Evidence claimed insufficient to put defendant on defense — Duty to discharge defendant or direct verdict — Section 13442-13, General Code — Duty of trial court to examine prospective jurors — Court of Appeals — Number of judges required to reverse on evidence — Fair trial — Section 6, Article IV, Constitution.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeals dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.