KAYS v. TOWN OF NEWTON, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Roland Vreeland argued the cause for the appellant ( Mr. Gerald T. Foley, attorney). Mr. Willis H. Sherred argued the cause for the respondent ( Mr. Lewis Van Blarcom, attorney).

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Roland Vreeland argued the cause for the appellant ( Mr. Gerald T. Foley, attorney). Mr. Willis H. Sherred argued the cause for the respondent ( Mr. Lewis Van Blarcom, attorney).

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

LOUIS J. KAYS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF FRED LOGES, DECEASED,PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWN OF NEWTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Colie in the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices CASE, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD and BURLING — 5.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.