Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRANCESCO VIENI, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed. Upon this appeal, there was presented, and necessarily passed upon, a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant contended that the use against him upon the trial of evidence acquired by illegal search and seizure violated the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. This court held that the conviction herein was not improper by virtue of the admission of such evidence, and that its use did not deprive appellant of his rights under said amendment nor of due process ( People v. Defore, 242 N.Y. 13; People v. Richter's Jewelers, Inc., 291 N.Y. 161; Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25). No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. VIENI
(May 18, 1950)