Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HALLMARK PRODUCTIONS, INC., APPELLANT v. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, DIVISION OF FILM CENSORSHIP, APPELLEE.

Motion pictures — Film censorship — Proceeding to set aside and vacate order rejecting exhibition — Procedure — Appeal dismissed.

Per Curiam.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed, sua sponte. The proceeding to review an order of the Department of Education, relative to the censoring of motion picture films is by the commencement of an action in the Supreme Court as prescribed by Section 154-47 h, General Code. North American Committee to Aid Spanish Democracy v. Bowsher, Dir. of Education, Division of Film Censorship, 132 Ohio St. 599, 9 N.E.2d 617.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, TURNER and TAFT, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HALLMARK PROD. v. DEPT. OF EDUCATION
(Jun 7, 1950)