Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

FINFROCK ET AL., APPELLANTS v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. RADCLIFFE HEIGHTS AREA ASSN. ET AL., APPELLANTS

Appeal — From Public Utilities Commission to Supreme Court — Section 547, General Code — Sixty-day limitation — From date of order, not date of denial of rehearing.

BY THE COURT.

These causes are before this court on motions by appellee to dismiss the appeals filed herein from orders of the Public Utilities Commission. The notice of appeal in each case was not filed within 60 days from the date of the entry of the final order of the commission dismissing the complaint but was filed within 60 days from the entry of the order overruling an application for rehearing.

Section 547, General Code, provides that "no proceeding to reverse, vacate or modify a final order of the commission shall be deemed commenced unless the notice of appeal is filed within sixty days after the entry of the final order complained of upon the journal of the commission."

The "final order," as the term is used in that section is, in each of the instant cases, the order dismissing the complaint, against which the application for rehearing is directed, and is not the order overruling the application for rehearing.

The appeals not having been perfected within the time required by statute, the motions to dismiss the appeals are sustained. Conway, Jr., et al., Recrs., v. Public Utilities Commission, 133 Ohio St. 530, 14 N.E.2d 929.

Appeals dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART and TURNER, JJ., concur.

ZIMMERMAN, J., not participating.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FINFROCK v. P.U.C
(Jun 14, 1950)