Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BOOZER v. BOOZER.

ATKINSON, Presiding Justice.

Where there was evidence that the husband was the owner of a $4000 equity in two dwelling houses and a vacant lot on Kirkwood Avenue, S.E., certain tools and equipment used in his business as a plumbing contractor, weekly profits from his business of $200 per week, and that his wife had lived with him for forty years and raised six children, all of whom had reached their majority, and that she had no independent income and was unable to work; and where the judgment for permanent alimony gave the wife a one-half interest in the equity in the real estate, $25 per week, and $100 as attorney's fees — this court cannot say as a matter of law that the judgment was excessive.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

No. 17095. JUNE 13, 1950.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BOOZER v. BOOZER
(Jun 13, 1950)