AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

LENA BERENSON, Petitioner, v. BENNY BERENSON, Respondent.

I. MONTEFIORE LEVY, J.

Petitioner and respondent were married in New York City on February 21, 1948.

No marriage license had been obtained by the couple nor had the physical examination, required by section 13-a Dom. Rel. of the Domestic Relations Law for the serological test for the discovery of syphilis, been complied with.

Respondent questions the validity of the marriage and refuses to support petitioner on this basis.

The absence of a marriage license does not make the marriage void.

Section 25 Dom. Rel. of the Domestic Relations Law makes this marriage valid. It provides: "Nothing * * * contained shall be construed to render void by reason of a failure to procure a marriage license any marriage solemnized between persons of full age * * *." ( Matter of Levy, 168 Misc. 864; Davidson v. Ream, 97 Misc. 89; Heller v. Heller, 188 Misc. 608.)

Section 17 Dom. Rel. of the Domestic Relations Law provides that:

The person officiating and performing such a ceremony is guilty of a crime. He may be punished by a fine not less than $50 or more than $500 or by imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year.

I find, therefore, this couple to be married; that the failure of the parties to procure a marriage license does not invalidate the marriage; that respondent is liable for petitioner's support within the jurisdiction of this court.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BERENSON v. BERENSON
(Jun 14, 1950)