Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTHONY LAWRENCE DI LORENZO, Appellant.

Per Curiam.

There is evidence of record sufficient in law to support the judgment insofar as it convicts the defendant of grand larceny, second degree. ( People v. Galbo, 218 N.Y. 283, 290; People v. Weldon, 111 N.Y. 569, 576-577; Goldstein v. People, 82 N.Y. 231, 234-235; Knickerbocker v. People, 43 N.Y. 177, 179-180; Stover v. People, 56 N.Y. 315, 317-318). Insofar as the judgment convicts the defendant of forgery, second degree, it is reversed and the third count of the indictment (forgery) is dismissed, upon the ground that the record contains no evidence that the defendant committed in Queens County the forgery charged.

The judgments should be modified in accordance with the opinion herein, and, as so modified, affirmed.

LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. DI LORENZO
(Jul 11, 1950)