PER CURIAM.
A careful consideration of the briefs, the record and the oral argument convinces us that the learned trial judge committed no error in this proceeding which would require a reversal of the judgment below. No new point of law is presented which should be discussed here. See Porter v. Warner Holding Co., 328 U.S. 395, 66 S.Ct. 1086, 90 L.Ed. 1332; Woods v. Richman, 9 Cir., 174 F.2d 614, and Brooks v. Woods, 9 Cir., 181 F.2d 716. The judgment is affirmed.