CURETON v. BERGER, Fla., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Hampton, Bull Crom, William C. Pierce, William M. Gober, A.W. Brubaker, Neil C. McMullen, Mabry, Reaves, Carlton, Anderson, Fields Ward and Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison Kelly, all of Tampa, for appellants. Gibbons Gibbons and Whitaker, Whitaker Terrell, all of Tampa, for appellees Ernest Berger and Riley J. McMaster, as executors and trustees of last will and testament of Letitia V. Graham, Deceased. Graham Dixon, Tampa, for appellee Board of Trustees having control and management of Edmund Gaines Graham Home. James S. Moody, Plant City, for appellees Hillsborough County, Fla., and Board of County Commissioners of said County. Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General, for appellee State of Florida.

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Hampton, Bull Crom, William C. Pierce, William M. Gober, A.W. Brubaker, Neil C. McMullen, Mabry, Reaves, Carlton, Anderson, Fields Ward and Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison Kelly, all of Tampa, for appellants. Gibbons Gibbons and Whitaker, Whitaker Terrell, all of Tampa, for appellees Ernest Berger and Riley J. McMaster, as executors and trustees of last will and testament of Letitia V. Graham, Deceased. Graham Dixon, Tampa, for appellee Board of Trustees having control and management of Edmund Gaines Graham Home. James S. Moody, Plant City, for appellees Hillsborough County, Fla., and Board of County Commissioners of said County. Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General, for appellee State of Florida.

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

WILLIE MAE CURETON ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. ERNEST BERGER AND RILEY J. McMASTER, AS EXECUTORS AND TRUSTEES OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF LETITIA V. GRAHAM, DECEASED, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

On Rehearing

Upon rehearing granted, this case has again been reviewed, and we are of the view that our original opinion should be reaffirmed and adhered to.

It is so ordered.

ADAMS, C.J., and TERRELL, CHAPMAN and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

THOMAS, SEBRING, and HOBSON, JJ., dissent.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.