Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HOGE et al. v. DEUTSCH.

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel. It was heard below by the District Judge without the intervention of a jury. The Judge filed an opinion including findnigs of fact and conclusions of law. D.C. 94 F. Supp. 33. The findings of fact are not clearly erroneous.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from be and the same is in all things affirmed upon the grounds and for the reasons set forth in the decision of the district court, including the findings of fact and conclusions of law filed February 15, 1949.

The appellee is not entitled to additional relief by way of special damages as set out in his brief. There was no cross appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HOGE v. DEUTSCH
(Nov 13, 1950)