AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SANSON HOSIERY MILLS, Inc., et al. v. SIGNATURE HOSIERY CO., Inc.

CLARY, District Judge.

This is a patent infringement suit involving a design for ladies stockings. The matter is presently before me on defendant's motion for summary judgment. The defendant is asking me to enter judgment in its favor on the ground that its product does not infringe the design which is the subject matter of the plaintiffs' patent.

Even accepting as fact the allegations contained in the affidavits in support of defendant's motion, I would not be disposed to say that I am convinced that there is no infringement. Further, I may not accept as fact the allegations of the affidavits in support of the motion. Such affidavits may only be considered for the purpose of ascertaining whether an issue of fact is presented. They may not be used as a basis for deciding the fact issues. Frederick Hart Co., Inc., v. Recordgraph Corporation, 3 Cir., 169 F.2d 580.

There are clearly issues of fact presented in the pleadings before me and those issues must await a proper determination at trial.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SANSON HOSIERY MILLS v. SIGNATURE HOSIERY CO., (E.D.Pa. 1950)
(Nov 15, 1950)