Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

GOODMAN v. WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

Habeas Corpus — If Second Application for Leave To Appeal Contains No New Allegations Worthy Of Note. It Will Be Denied.

If a second application for leave to appeal a habeas corpus case contains no new allegations worthy of note, it will be denied. p. 638

Decided December 6, 1950.

HENDERSON, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an application for leave to appeal from a refusal of a writ of habeas corpus. The applicant was convicted of murder in the first degree and sentenced to life imprisonment in 1945. This is his second application for appeal. 190 Md. 746, 60 A.2d 527; certiorari denied Goodman v. Swenson, 335 U.S. 847, 69 S.Ct. 58, 93 L.Ed. 397; Id., 337 U.S. 933, 69 S.Ct. 1488, 93 L.Ed. 1740. The present application is only a rehash of his previous contentions, and contains no new allegations worthy of note.

Application denied, with costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GOODMAN v. WARDEN
(Dec 6, 1950)