Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GRIGGS v. STATE.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Murder is the offense; the punishment, twenty-five years' confinement in the penitentiary.

No bills of exception appear.

That appellant killed deceased by cutting him with a knife is not disputed.

The jury rejected appellant's theory of self-defense. The facts support the conviction.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.

On Motion for Rehearing.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

The indictment against appellant was returned on December 8, 1948.

Upon its face, it purports to have been returned by the Grand Jury of Matagorda County empaneled as such at 'the December-May Term A.D. 1948.' The offense is alleged to have been committed on or about June 18, 1948.

In his motion for rehearing, appellant contends that the indictment shows that the alleged offense was committed after the term of court at which the indictment was returned had adjourned, and is therefore void.

We are unable to agree with such contention.

Art. 199, R.C.S., Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. Art. 199, provides for a term of the 23rd Judicial District Court to be held in Matagorda County, Texas, to be known as the December-May Term and to begin on the first Monday in December.

An indictment returned by a grand jury in such court on December 8, 1948, which charged an offense to have been committed on or about June 18, 1948, charges such offense to have been committed long prior to the beginning of the term on the first Monday in December.

Appellant's motion for rehearing is overruled.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GRIGGS v. STATE
(Jan 10, 1951)