Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

RODERICK HOCTOR et al., Claimants, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Defendant. (Claim No. 30230.)

RYAN, J.

In making its award in this case the court has given consideration to all of the material testimony offered in order to arrive at the greatest value which claimants are entitled to receive for any available use to which their lands may be put. ( Matter of City of Rochester [ Smith St. Bridge], 234 A.D. 583.) However, the court is unable to award damages based on loss of business conducted by Mr. Hoctor or for loss of his profits therein or for reduction of earnings occasioned by the restriction of his activities as a fisherman's guide. ( Mitchell v. United States, 267 U.S. 341; Banner Milling Co. v. State of New York, 240 N.Y. 533; Burdick v. State of New York, 276 A.D. 1052.)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HOCTOR v. STATE OF NEW YORK
(Feb 8, 1951)