Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE EX REL. EDWARDS v. MURRAY, JUDGE.

MANDAMUS — Jurisdiction, Proceedings and Relief — Petition — Form, Requisites and Sufficiency — Failure To Set Forth Pleadings, Orders and Entries — Petition Insufficient. — In an original mandamus action seeking relief relative to a proceeding in an inferior court, a petition is insufficient if it fails to set out, or have attached thereto as exhibits, certified copies of all pleadings, orders and entries pertaining to the subject matter in the inferior court, and relief would be denied. Rules of the Supreme Court, 2-35.

PER CURIAM.

The relator, appearing pro se, files what he designates as a verified petition for an alternative writ of mandate to compel certain action by the respondent judge.

The relief sought relates to a proceeding in an inferior court, but wholly fails to comply with the requirements of Rule 2-35.

The issuance of the writ is denied.

NOTE. — Reported in 98 N.E.2d 368.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE EX REL. EDWARDS v. MURRAY
(May 1, 1951)