Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Akins, Appellant, v. York Officers' and Employees' Retirement Board.

Altieri v. Allentown Officers' and Employees' Retirement Board, 368 Pa. 176, followed.

OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE JONES, June 27, 1951:

The question involved on this appeal is the same as in the case of Altieri v. Allentown Officers' and Employees' Retirement Board, p. 176 ante. The result in the lower court in the instant case is opposite to that reached in the Altieri case. In this case the learned court below sustained the defendant board's contention that Section 4(b) of the Third Class City Employees Retirement Law of May 23, 1945, P.L. 903, violates Sections 11 and 18 of Article III of the Pennsylvania Constitution and, accordingly, entered judgment for the board. The plaintiff-employee thereupon brought this appeal. As we pointed out in the Altieri case, supra, the constitutional questions need not be considered in view of the fact that Section 4(b) is deficient and unenforceable. For the reasons set forth in the Altieri case, we approve the judgment entered in the instant case.

Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

AKINS v. YORK RETIREMENT BOARD
(Jun 27, 1951)