Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Ste v. TAYLOR and Jennie Taylor, Appellants,

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel.

And it appearing that the District Court found appellant Steve Taylor guilty of contempt of court in failing to make restitution in accordance with the order of the District Court entered October 21, 1949;

And it appearing that the court found that appellant Steve Taylor is financially able to comply with the order of the court, but knowingly, willfully, and intentionally disobeyed the order of the District Court;

And it further appearing that the findings of the court are amply supported by the record, and no reversible error being shown:

The order of the District Court is hereby affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TAYLOR v. WOODS
(Oct 10, 1951)