AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

PENNSYLVANIA-READING SEASHORE LINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF PUBLICUTILITY COMMISSIONERS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Eastwood in the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices CASE, WACHENFELD, BURLING and ACKERSON — 5.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PENNA.-READING SEASHORE LINES v. BD. OF PUB UTILITY COM'RS
(Oct 22, 1951)