THE NATIONAL STATE BANK OF NEWARK v. STUART, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Richard V. Stein argued the cause for the appellant Margaret Acheson Stuart ( Messrs. Stein, Stein Hughes, attorneys). Mr. Coleman Burke argued the cause for the appellant Lyall L. Stuart. Mr. William H. Corbin argued the cause for the respondents guardians ad litem. Mr. Donald B. Kipp argued the cause for the respondent trustee ( Messrs. Pitney, Hardin Ward, attorneys).

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Richard V. Stein argued the cause for the appellant Margaret Acheson Stuart ( Messrs. Stein, Stein Hughes, attorneys). Mr. Coleman Burke argued the cause for the appellant Lyall L. Stuart. Mr. William H. Corbin argued the cause for the respondents guardians ad litem. Mr. Donald B. Kipp argued the cause for the respondent trustee ( Messrs. Pitney, Hardin Ward, attorneys).

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

THE NATIONAL STATE BANK OF NEWARK, AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE UNDER DEED OF TRUSTOF EDWARD GOODRICH ACHESON, DATED JULY 10, 1928, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MARGARET ACHESON STUART, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Freund in the Superior Court, Chancery Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices CASE, WACHENFELD, BURLING and ACKERSON — 6.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.