Prohibition — Writ not available as substitute for appeal.
Per Curiam.
The plaintiffs, not having availed themselves of the usual and adequate remedy of appeal, may not resort to the extraordinary remedy of prohibition as a substitute therefor. State, ex rel. Nicklaus, v. McClelland, Judge, 132 Ohio St. 447, 8 N.E.2d 565; Shafer v. Common Pleas Court of Franklin County, 137 Ohio St. 429, 30 N.E.2d 811; State, ex rel. Ellis, v. McCabe et al., Judges, 138 Ohio St. 417, 35 N.E.2d 571; State, ex rel. Levy, v. Savord, 143 Ohio St. 451, 55 N.E.2d 735; State, ex rel. Miller, v. Court of Common Pleas of Lake County, 151 Ohio St. 397, 86 N.E.2d 464; State, ex rel. Clary, v. Probate Court of Preble County, 151 Ohio St. 497, 86 N.E.2d 765; State, ex rel. Sparto, v. Juvenile Court of Darke County, 153 Ohio St. 64, 90 N.E.2d 598; State, ex rel. Hough, v. Municipal Court of Cleveland, 153 Ohio St. 287, 91 N.E.2d 506.
The demurrers to the petition are sustained and a writ of prohibition is denied.
Writ denied.
WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, MIDDLETON, TAFT, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.