Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

KREGER, ADMINISTRATOR v. BOWMAN ET AL.

1. APPEAL — Appellate Jurisdiction — Decisions Reviewable — Final Judgment Necessary. — To be appealable as a final judgment an order or judgment must be one which finally determines the rights of the parties in the suit or in some distinct and definite branch of it, and which leaves no further question or direction for future determination by the court. p. 607.

2. APPEAL — Appellate Jurisdiction — Decisions Reviewable — Final Judgment Necessary — Overruling of Motion To Strike Claim Against Estate Not Final Judgment. — The overruling of a motion to strike a claim from the files and docket of a decedent's estate is not a final judgment from which an appeal may be taken. p. 607.

WILTROUT, J.

A motion was filed by appellant to strike from the files and docket of the estate of Alfred Sisk, deceased, a claim previously filed by appellees. This motion was overruled, and appellant would challenge this ruling. The motion is not set forth in the briefs.

Appellant treats this appeal as one from a final judgment. "To be appealable as a final judgment an order or judgment must be one which finally determines the rights of the parties in 1. the suit, or in some distinct and definite branch of it, and which leaves no further question or direction for future determination by the court." Greathouse v. McKinney (1942), 220 Ind. 462, 44 N.E.2d 344; Home Electric Light Power Co. v. Globe Tissue Paper Co. (1896), 145 Ind. 174, 44 N.E. 191; Zumpfe v. Piccadilly Realty Co. (1938), 214 Ind. 282, 13 N.E.2d 715, 15 N.E.2d 362; Gross Income Tax Div. v. National Bank (1948), 226 Ind. 293, 79 N.E.2d 651; Blakeman v. Quinn (1950), 121 Ind. App. 72, 95 N.E.2d 638.

The ruling in this case does not meet the test of a final 2. judgment. We have determined not to pass upon this issue.

Appeal dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 101 N.E.2d 433.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KREGER v. BOWMAN
(Nov 2, 1951)