Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CRANE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Joseph HANLEY, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The court, having duly considered the briefs and arguments of the attorneys for the contending parties and the whole record in the case, thinks that the judgment awarded plaintiff by the District Court should be upheld for the reasons stated in the opinion, the amended opinion, and the opinion on motion for new trial, filed by the United States District Court; and

The judgment of the District Court is, accordingly, ordered to be affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CRANE COMPANY v. HANLEY
(Dec 10, 1951)