Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

GAETANO IODICE et al., Appellants, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent. (Claim No. 28103.)

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE and FULD, JJ. FROESSEL, J., dissents in the following memorandum: I dissent and vote for reversal for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion below ( 277 App. Div. 647, 654). Moreover, the evidence is uncontradicted that the natural flow of water was substantially increased by waters continuously diverted into the Delta Reservoir during July, August and through September 15, 1945, through the artificial Forestport feeder created and controlled by the State.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IODICE v. STATE
(Dec 7, 1951)