Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THOMPSON v. CURRY.

SIMPSON, Justice.

This petition for certiorari to the Court of Appeals seeks a review and revision of that court's opinion and judgment reversing the judgment below on the ground that "the evidence is so overwhelmingly against the verdict of the jury that it would be unjust and wrong to let it stand." The petition is not well taken. This conclusion is but a finding of fact. Under well-recognized and long-established principles of review consistently adhered to by this court, we accept that conclusion without going to the record to determine its correctness, of consequence of which it is not subject to revision. Rainey v. State, 245 Ala. 458(8), 17 So.2d 687; Clayton v. State, 244 Ala. 307, 13 So.2d 423.

Writ denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and BROWN, LAWSON, and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

THOMPSON v. CURRY
(Jan 17, 1952)