Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Gross, Appellant, v. Clapper.

Appeals — Review — Charge to jury — Absence of exceptions.

Alleged errors in the trial judge's charge to the jury cannot be reviewed on appeal where the complaining party failed to make any objections to the charge and did not take any exceptions thereto, either specific or general.

OPINION PER CURIAM, January 16, 1952:

On this appeal from a judgment entered on a verdict for defendants, plaintiff has contended that certain instructions contained in the charge of the learned trial judge were erroneous and that the lower court should not have refused her motion for a new trial. However, plaintiff failed to make any objections to the charge and did not take any exceptions thereto, either specific or general. We cannot therefore review any of the alleged errors raised by plaintiff and must sustain the judgment of the court below: Senita v. Marcy, 324 Pa. 199, 188 A. 153.

Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GROSS v. CLAPPER
(Jan 16, 1952)