Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

VOGT v. CORLEY ET AL.

1. REAL PROPERTY — Title — Rights of Parties. This action presents specifications of error identical with those considered in Fastenau v. Engel, 125 Colo. 119, and is ruled by the decision in that case.

MR. JUSTICE KNAUSS delivered the opinion of the court.Page 125

THIS action involves the title to a different tract of land, but presents specifications of error identical with those considered in cause No. 16539, Fastenau v. Engel, 125 Colo. 119, 240 P.2d 1173, this day decided, and controlling herein. In the instant case no cross complaint asking for a decree quieting title in defendant Corley was filed.

All matters in this action having been considered and determined in Fastenau v. Engel, supra, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to strike the separate and further defense set forth in paragraph III of the amended answer, and all of the supplemental answer, and proceed to trial of the cause on the issues presented by the amended complaint and amended answer.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

VOGT v. CORLEY
(Feb 4, 1952)