Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

TIMOTHY J. HURLEY, Claimant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Defendant. (Claim No. 31041.)

YOUNG, J.

Claimant's farm land lies on both sides of the St. Regis River in St. Lawrence County and on each side is adjacent to a highway which bridges the river. When the State undertook to improve the highway there was no usable bridge over the river from June 9, 1949, to December 1, 1949, and thus, during this time, claimant was prevented from passing directly from one part of his farm land to the other.

Claim is now made for damages resulting from an alleged temporary appropriation of the "claimant's right to uninterrupted access to and from said highway" and for deprivation of "its just and free use and enjoyment for travel and the usual purposes of a public highway".

No land of the claimant was appropriated and each part of the claimant's land has the same access to the highway on which it abuts as always existed. Any inconvenience to the claimant is damnum absque injuria. ( Van Aken v. State of New York, 261 N.Y. 360; Miller v. State of New York, 229 A.D. 423.)

The court's holding renders unnecessary any consideration of the sufficiency of a release executed by the claimant and his wife to the State.

The State's motion to dismiss the claim as not stating facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action is hereby granted.

Submit order accordingly.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HURLEY v. STATE OF NEW YORK
(Feb 28, 1952)