Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

JOHN MURPHY, Respondent, v. PETERSON CIPHER CODE CORP., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Judgments reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the jury was not clearly instructed that the written statement by the plaintiff's witness Bowman could not serve as affirmative evidence of substantive facts stated therein but only, as a means of impeachment, to prove that he had made a prior statement inconsistent with his testimony upon the trial. ( Matter of Roge v. Valentine, 280 N.Y. 268, 276-277; Civ. Prac. Act, § 343-a.) No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MURPHY v. PETERSON CIPHER CODE CORP
(Mar 14, 1952)