STRUYK v. SAMUEL BRAEN'S SONS, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Hugh C. Spernow argued the cause for the appellant ( Messrs. Evans, Hand and Evans, of counsel). Mr. Paul Rittenberg argued the cause for the respondent ( Mr. Peter Hofstra, attorney; Mr. Howard Stern, on the brief).

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Hugh C. Spernow argued the cause for the appellant ( Messrs. Evans, Hand and Evans, of counsel). Mr. Paul Rittenberg argued the cause for the respondent ( Mr. Peter Hofstra, attorney; Mr. Howard Stern, on the brief).

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

NEIL STRUYK, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE BOROUGH OF NORTH HALEDON,PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SAMUEL BRAEN'S SONS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge William J. Brennan, Jr., in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING and JACOBS — 5.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.